#N.Y. COURTS SEEK ROOT OUT IS FULL#

A trust that the court is guided by legal principle, not politics. But that authority, like the rule of law, depends on trust. “I hope and expect that the court will retain its authority … which was hard won. Namely, how would court packing reflect and affect the rule of law itself?” “This lecture reflects my own effort to be certain that those who are going to debate these questions … also consider an important institutional point.

I’m sure that others will discuss related political arguments,” liberal justice Stephen Breyer said during a speech at Harvard Law School last week. “Proposals have been recently made to increase the number of Supreme Court justices. So, how do current Supreme Court justices feel about expanding the Supreme Court in an effort to “balance” it? President Biden now calls the filibuster a relic of the Jim Crow era. No longer would the Senate be the ‘saucer’ to cool the passions of the immediate majority.” “No longer would the Senate be that ‘different kind of legislative body’ that the Founders intended. “It is not only a bad idea, it upsets the constitutional design and it disservices the country,” Biden said in a speech he deemed one of the most important of his career. Biden also argued in 2005 that ending the filibuster “would eviscerate the Senate and turn it into the House of Representatives.” NY Times editorial board pushes back on Biden’s use of executive actions, asks him to “ease up” /XteF1UnJba Joe Biden back in 1983 calling court packing “a terrible, terrible mistake” and “boneheaded.” But as we’ve seen time and again, pre-president Biden’s words and President Biden’s actions are in constant contradiction.Īs a candidate, Biden argued that a president using executive orders instead of going through Congress makes one a “dictator.” President Biden goes on to sign 38 executive orders in less than three months, more than any of his predecessors by a country mile.

It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make, and it put in question, for an entire decade, the independence of the most significant body-including the Congress in my view-the most significant body in this country, the Supreme Court of the United States of America.” It was totally within his right to do that-he violated no law, he was legalistically absolutely correct. But it was a bonehead idea. “President Roosevelt clearly had the right to send to the United States Senate and the United States Congress a proposal to pack the Court. If Biden wants to go ahead and turn the Supreme Court into a 15-judge court, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) will be happy to support the effort, all while citing racism as a primary reason to stave off any criticism from the right or any objective members of the media.

#N.Y. COURTS SEEK ROOT OUT IS FULL#

Hell, it ain’t even 2009, the last full year Democrats controlled the House and the Senate. Result: Nine justices remained the number and has to this day.īut 2021 ain’t 1937.

Roosevelt wanted to add six SCOTUS justices, but was thwarted by an overwhelmingly Democratically controlled Congress, which otherwise had passed anything FDR wanted during his first term. Not since before the 78-year-old Biden was born has any president even considered adding seats to the Supreme Court. And ask yourself this: If the roles were reversed and, say, a President Trump ordered a commission through executive order to study expanding the Supreme Court in the name of balance, would the Times frame it the same way? Yep - it’s “an effort to balance the conservative majority created by Donald Trump.” That’s just about the best unintentional comedy you’ll see out there. That’s the way the New York Times – the so-called paper of record that hasn’t endorsed a Republican presidential candidate in 65 years – explained a commission to radically change the high court in what could ultimately go down as one of the most radical acts carried out by a U.S. “Breaking News: President Biden will create a panel to study expanding the Supreme Court in an effort to balance the conservative majority created by Donald Trump.”īreaking News: President Biden will create a panel to study expanding the Supreme Court in an effort to balance the conservative majority created by Donald Trump.

N.y. courts seek root out is